In the 1st part of this article I have explained a relations between visibility and weather conditions as well as an astronomical factor and light scattering issue. Now I would like to explain the contrast phenomena and human eye perception of the view is to be described. Recently the contrast issue has been mentioned in case of light transition, however that matter was related more to photography instead to eye perception. At the finish I would like to back to the weather forecast again. A bit of this stuff has been arleady presented before, but this is still some stuff to show. Let’s get busy then.
- A CONTRAST ROLE IN SIMPLIFIED MODEL FOR VISUAL RANGES AT DAYLIGHT CONDITIONS
Usually the best contrast with the sky in the background is to be made by the closest objects, that because of their vicinity to the observer are often unobstructed by haze or air molecules. In every single mountain range, located as a latter its appearance will be different despite of air transparency. This is the contrast effect between these two mountain ranges, where a second, further one appear more diminished. The same situation will refer to next mountain range, located further, than second one seen by observer, etc. (Pic. 1). It is driven by the contrast law, which says, that an distant object appearance (an object illuminance observed) depends on: a real object illuminance, a distance this object to the observer and air transparency.
The contrast law is described simply by scattering coefficient C, where C = 1 indicates a completely dark or sharp view against the sky beyond. It refers to objects seen directly from i.e. 1km distance, where path between an observer and the object is unaffected by haze or air molecules. In turn, when C = 0 an object is far enough to be completely invisible at particular weather (atmosphere clarity) conditions, which obviously are different, what you could read in previous part of this article. What exactly means the value 1 or 0? This is the contrast value, that varies between 0 and 1 lines/ min of arc , where 0 states, that object is not visible both to the naked eye and on the digital photos after enhancement. An opposite value 1 indicates an perfect view with the biggest contrast against the sky.
Looking on the charts below, we can see the contrasts for various scattering coefficient. There are 3 curves taken into account, where the black one represents the clearest atmosphere as oppose to the red one, typical for extremely hazy conditions. A lower chart (Pic. 3) shows a detailed situation of extremely low contrast against the distance. A red and blue dotted line shows a maximum visibility range as seen by the observer, knowing that the visibility treshold for human eye is somewhat above 0.02 lines/min of arc (Schober, Hilz, 1965). It means, that perceivable contrast difference reaches a critical value, typically assumed to be around 2%.
The principal basis is, that if the source if light is further, then its appearance is more faint up to be completely invisible. It arises out of increasing air illuminance on the line of sight between an eye and object observed.
The charts above (Pic. 2, 3) show also another important feature – the line of contrast coefficnent, which behaves like a logarithmic function. As you may have noticed, the contrast for various scattering coefficient behaves like a logarithmic scale. It means, that object looks much more fainter comparing it within a short distance. When we compare the view of the object on longer distance, near the maximum value of visual range its appearance doesn’t vary so much. To be more practical, for shorter paths, like between 20km and 50km distance an observer will see a bigger difference with object illuminance. In turn, the remote object outlines, barely visible by human eye tend to remain visible with no huge differences i.e between 100km and 130km line of sight distance (Pic. 4). I believe, that you will find a better examples. All images comprised to pic. 4 has been done in the same air mass, but at a different angular distance to the Sun due to journey progress.
It’s good to mention, that the scattering coefficient varies due another factors, like density of precipitation and, what is much more important the object illuminance, what epends on its surface. The different light wavelengths makes a various scattering coefficient (Pic. 5).
Regarding to the considerations above about a contrast and scattering coefficient we usually assume, that the atmosphere is horizontally homogeneous, consisting of only a spatially uniform distribution of molecules and haze aerosols. The atmosphere homogenity is an important factor, but for this discussion has been omitted. This is for sake of simplification. Normally the effects of localized haze layers could be considered as well as a different kind of aerosols scattering. To simplify it is easier to take the same angular scattering factor for molecules and aerosols scattered both isotropic and antisotropic. Moreover every light scattered in the atmosphere is undermined by molecular and aerosol absorption. Most of paths through the atmosphere to remote objects are slightly oblique if the observer and object have different heights.
An analogue phenomena to this, which can occur commonly, is cloudiness, which has been roughly explained in the previous part of this article.
The aerosol optical thickness is a measure of the extinction of the solar beam by dust and haze. It tell us how much direct sunlight is prevented from reaching the ground by haze, dust, smoke and pollution. An average aerosol optical depth is between 0.1 to 0.15. A value of 0.01 corresponds to an extremely clean atmosphere and value of 0.4 would correspond to very hazy conditions. These values are dependant on the same factors like visual range conditions. For example the image below shows an aerosol optical depth variation for opposite seasons around the Globe (Pic. 6).
Looking on the image above we can also find an answer, why the visibility conditions tend to be the worst in Europe during the summer, when aerosol optical depth is the biggest. However is not a rule, because a climate is dynamic and changes every year. We should treat it as a tendency.
More about aerosol optical depth says the Angstrom coefficient. Angstrom coefficient describes the dependancy of the aerosol optical thickness or aerosol extinction coefficient on wavelength (Pic. 7). The Angstrom exponent is inversely related to the average size of the particles in the aerosol – when the particles are smaller, the exponent is larger.
2. HUMAN PERCEPTION OF VISIBILITY AGAINST THE PHOTOGRAPHY AND SIMPLE IMAGE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
Human perceptions of the horizontal visibility we should treat like psychophysical responses of the eye-brain system to incoming radiation (Malm, 2016). This factor determines the skill of the observer at resolving the object against its background. This is referred to as the minimum contrast between the object and sky (AlecBennett, 2016). It was concluded that the eye-brain system to some degree compensated for the effects of haze on the color change of the landscape feature as haze level increased or decreased (Malm, 2016). The human eye operates much like a photographic camera, because it has a lens to focus an image on a very sensitive detector called the retina (Malm et all. 1999). The eye is able to detects relative differences in brightness, thus the eye measures contrast between adjacent objects or between an object and its background. As you know from previous section the contrast of an object is simply the percent difference between object luminance and its background (Malm et all, 1999). Visibility estimates can also be made during the night by observing the maximum distance that a light of known intensity can be identified. Human eye can easily identify closer targets in full moonlight. In this case the relation between illumination and light scattering within the haze or air molecules will be the same. Moonlight is too faint to distinguish extremely far objects, which usually during the day, even under the best atmospheric clarity looks like faint outlines with small contrast between them and illuminaed sky beyond. For these very distant objects with a visual range close to their distance from the observer important is assumption to be black in order to enhancement their outlines. It will give the best possible contrast with the horizon. As we know, the contrast critical value for human eye is 0.02 of scattering coefficient. To move this critical value down we definitely need a digital photo enhancement (Pic. 8).
There are a ways how to do it. Some of them I described here. Another one, the quickest for mobile phones is provided by Photoshop Express. Anyhow this step is necessary for these objects, because the amount of light transmitted from them is strongly attenuated via scattering along the line of sight. Such that the observer sees very little transmitted object radiation or, as often happens, the objects appears to be invisible by naked eye and a further photo corrections are required. The exception of this are non-black objects like snow-capped mountains, which are able to reflect the sunlight more effectively.
3. HOW TO PREDICT A GOOD VISIBILITY CONDITIONS?
The best way to predict a good visibility conditions is looking on the special weather forecast websites. Nowadays it is becoming more straighworward due to a quick development of interactive weather predictions and real-time weather monitorings. However some of these platforms doesn’t contain the much important weather elements such a humidity, visibility or dust concentration, which for long-distance observation observers plays a key role. Instead of this you can find a decent information about precipitation, cloudiness, temperature, etc. which obviously can help, but more for people being clued up enough with a visibility predictions. Possibly you will become this type of person when you have read a previous part of this article. Anyway, even if you did this I am going to show you more simple way to check the visibility patterns for a few days ahead between observation place and potential objects (mountains) to be observed at once. For this purpose I will use both some numerical weather predictions and especially an interactive weather forecast platforms, which become popular recently.
Maybe not the most known yet, but for sure the most convenient interactive weather forecast is the Windy.com platform. I would like to stick to this server a bit longer, because anyone, who is interested in a visibility conditions can find a relevant weather elements there.
The Windy.com has a well developed menu, where a lot of weather elements has been taken into account. All of them has been presented in the picture below (Pic. 10), where these ones, relevant from a visual range point of view has been redded off.
These elements are obviously proposal. I haven’t marked i.e. fog, because intentionally when fog occures, then a visual range is near 0, when is no fog, then is better to check the humidity value in order to know is for instance misty or not. Another element, which can be sometimes important is a dew point and precipitation, although In my opinion all elements marked by red rectangles should be sufficient to determine a visual range quality at the interesting area.
The Windy.com main menu is located on the right of course (Pic. 10). In the meantime, what I would advise you – create an account, because it can help you set your favourites or custom weather alerts, etc.
Before we start to analyze every weather element separately, I would like to aware you, that on the Windy.com portal you are also able to:
– check the detailed forecast for every single place (with meeogram too) around the World up to 5 days ahead! (Pic. 13) using a different forecast models, (Pic. 14)
– measure the distance between multiple places, (Pic. 15)
– check the sounding forecast, where you can check a local vertical atmosphere features, like a height of inversion layer, etc. (Pic. 19)
– adjust the weather forecast map to your needs (Pic. 16, 17) i.e. change units, layers colours or background map,
– embed the weather forecast map into your private website or blog.
So now, when you have an main menu issue sorted, you can check every weather elements one by one and asses will the visual range be decent or not (Pic. 12 – 15).
Ok, now we can analyze some weaher elements separately on a rough example. I would like to check are the Tatra Mts possible to see from Bieszczady Mts or not (Pic. 18)? The distance is 170km. First, that come to mind is checking the “Visibility” forecast, which unfortunately doesn’t play a key role here, because the scale is only up to 17-20km. When a visual range is longer than 20km, then everything is marked as a good. The legend (scale) you will find at the bottom right corner of the screen.
A humidity presents better, because on our line of sight is a considerable area where value drops to about 50%. However the most important parts of our path (where the highest mountains are located) features higher humidity level, reaching about 80% in places. Not favourable situation is provided also by cloudiness, where a low based clouds covers from about 50 to 70% sky on our path. In this event we can be sure, that the Tatra Mts won’t be visible at this moment. If you want, you can check another weather elements, such a dew point or dust forecast.
Looking on the very bottom of the screen you have got a timescale, where you can set another day ahead from now. Obviously the weather prediction there is only an assumption, however fel free to plan your observatons up to 3 days ahead!
Atmospheric sounding describes a plot of vertical profile of temperature, dew point and often the winds above a fixed location. Sounding is used in severe weather forecasting and also in determining a local temperature inversion and measuring the strength of capping inversion (Pic. 19).
Aside for the Windy.com platform there are another weather forecast websites, where you can check both real-time and numerical weather forecast from now to forthcoming few days. I would like to show some of them, which can help you to plan a long-distance observations.
As I said above in many weather forecast platforms, i.e Wxcharts.eu (Pic. 20) the humidity or visibility forecast is not provided (at least is not intuitive to find right after hitting the website), then you can look briefly on the relation between air and dew point temperature (Pic. 20). Once these 2 temperatures are quite far from each other, then can be a good time to see a distant objects. Higher air temperature next to low dew point temperature means, that a humidity level is lower. Sometimes a forecast maps includes both dew point temperature and humidity values (Pic. 21).
Is good to look on the maps, like this above, because always we have insight both on our observation place and a distant object observed. If you would likle to have to get more detailed informations, then you should zoom in in this case or find an appropriate numerical weather forecast platform, which covers the area of your interests and provides a relevant maps (Pic. 22).
Threading this way I wish I could show you every single weather forecast platform one by one, but it doesn’t make sense, because everyone can choose his own the best and most convenient weather forecast platform from the web or a full list available here.
Now I would like to focus a bit on weather meteograms, from which you can easily read when the conditions with the best visilility occur.
One of the best numerical weather forecast platforms, where you can get a very detailed meteogram is Meteo.pl. This Polish numerical weather forecast platform covers mainly central Europe with some southern and northern bits of this continent. Below I have prepared a meteogram for San Marino, where a good visibility period is going to occur at 9.12 (Pic. 23), which has been framed in black rectangle.
Looking at these 2 example meteograms above, you can notice, that the periods with possibly good visibility tend to be quite short. In this event, we can say about a moment, instead of particular day. When weather is dynamic, the good visibility can last even only a few hours, and as it worst it may not cover both an observation site and a distant mountain at once.
A main problem is, that these meteograms provided on a various weather forecast services are not equal to each other and often presents different data. The examples shown above are one of the most detailed, which we can find in the web. Unfortunately most of services provides a reduced forecast version with some weather elements (like humidity or dew point) not shown. However there is one universal website, where you will able to get a decent a weather meteogram after clicking on the map. An example from this website is presented below (Pic. 25). This is the weather meteogram for Cambridge with the best visibility conditions (for the time being) framed with a black rectangle.
Unlike to weather maps, the meteograms present a weather forecast for one place only, which is their main drawback in terms of long-distance observations. In this case it’s good to generate a meteogram at least for 2 places: your observation site and a distant object observed. I wrote at least, because sometimes weather pattern changes alongside the line of sight, as you could see above (Pic. 18).
Concluding this section, the best weather forecast service to check the visibility conditions is Windy.com. You can also use the Meteogram.com if you are interested in a visual range conditions in any place around the world. Another weather forecast websites are rather confined to their main areas, like central Europe, USA, etc., where they will be more useful.
This 2-section article have shown what is the horizontal visibility and the atmospheric conditions, that are associated with. The most important is weather factor, that basically decides about a good visibility or not. This weather factor consist the kind of air masses and dynamics (wind, pressure areas) and finally the haze concentration. Another elements play rather minor role. Knowing the Earth’s troposphere as a very dynamic layer I cannot assure in 100%, that all meteorological elements described above and earlier will perfectly indicate the moment with best horizontal visibility. There is no rule for it, however these information can help. On top of that, as a conclusion I can list a 10 major principles of better visibility conditions occurence:
1. When humidity level is lower, the visibility is better,
2. The visibility tends to be better behind a frontal band, which always brings a fresh air mass,
3. The cleareas air mass is antarctic and arctic,
4. The best moment to see a distant object is around 15-20m after sunrise or before sunset, when this object is located at antisolar direction or at civil twilight, when object is located around solar azimuth.
5. The best moment to see a distant object occur, when a whole line of sight is shaded by clouds, but the sky at the horizon beyond remains clear, being strongly illuminated at once,
6. Atmosphere is always more transparent when looking up, even within the boundary layer,
7. Wind helps to clear the atmosphere from haze particles, making a visual range better,
8. Own light emission helps a distant object being visible during the night,
9. The best visible surface from the distance is ice or snow, only when illuminated by Sun,
10. The best weather forecast platform to check a visual range conditions is Windy.com
Visibility includes also psychophysicsl processes where indicates human ability to perceive the object through the contrast treshold given by human eye. Is important to recognize and appreciate the form, contrast detail and color of near and distant features. Horizontal visibility is not only being able to see a black object at a distance for which the contrast reaches a treshold value. Is important how many details can we spot watching the distant object. I mean color of the mountain (vegetation, snow cover, shadows casts by overhead clouds), geological features and degree of urban or industrial infrastructure).
- Abdusalam G.A., 2012, Effect of clear atmospheric turbulence on quality of free space optical communication in western Asia, (in:) Optical Communication Systems
- Bohren C.F., Clothiaux E.E., 2006, Fundamentals of atmospheric radiation: An introduction with 400 problems, John Wiley & Sons, Weinheim
- Penndorf R., 1957, Tables of the refractive index for standard air and the Rayleigh scattering coefficient for the spectral region between 02-20u and their application to atmospheric optics, (in:) Journal Optical Society of America, vol.47, p.176 – 182
- Schober H.A.W., Hilz R., 1965, Contrast sensitivity of the human eye for square-vawe gratings, (in:) Journal of Optical Society of America, vol. 55, i. 9, p.1086-1091
- Schuster G.L., Dubovik O., Holben N., 2006, Angstrom exponent and bimodal aerosol size distribution, (in:) Geophysic Research, p.111
- Vollmer M., Shaw J.A., 2018, Extended visual range during solar eclipses, (in:) Applied Optics, vol. 57, no. 12, p.3250 – 3259
- Antisotropic scattering in spherical geometry
- Earthobservatory.nasa.gov: Aerosol optical depth
- Calculation of aerosol optical thickness
- Angstrom coefficient calculation
- Researchgate.net: A different scattering coefficients
- Analyzing of the long distance observation conditions – an example (Polish)
- Atmosphere sounding – what for?
- ESA: Sounding of the atmosphere
- University of Wyoming – Atmosphere sounding forecast arouund the world
- A list of weather forecast websites from around the world
- How to read a meteogram?